Corrections, Retractions & Appeals
KRJALS corrects the scholarly record openly when errors or misconduct come to light, following COPE guidance. Published articles are never silently changed or deleted.
|
Notice |
When it is used |
|---|---|
|
Correction (erratum) |
An honest error that affects part of the article but not its main conclusions |
|
Expression of concern |
Serious concerns are raised and an investigation is still under way |
|
Retraction |
The findings are unreliable because of major error or misconduct, or the work is plagiarised or duplicated |
Each notice is published with its own DOI and linked to the original article. A retracted article stays online, clearly marked "Retracted", with the reason stated.
Reporting a problem. Anyone may report a possible error or misconduct to [journal email], with supporting evidence. Reports are handled confidentially.
Appeals. Authors who believe a decision was wrong may appeal once, in writing, to the Editor-in-Chief within 30 days, explaining why. The appeal is reviewed by an editor not involved in the original decision, who may seek a further independent review. The outcome is communicated within [30] days and is final.
Complaints. Complaints about the journal's processes or staff go to the Editor-in-Chief . If the complaint concerns the Editor-in-Chief, send it to the publisher at admin@inlightpublishers.com.